Both novel and film are informed by the post-9/11 distrust of the Muslim other. This article offers a comparative reading of the novel and film adaptation of The Reluctant Fundamentalist, looking at the ways these texts represent changing Western public perceptions towards Pakistan and vice-versa along the temporal axis 2001–2007–2012. Seeking to demonstrate the workings of decolonial post-truth through a close reading of Mohsin Hamid's The Reluctant Fundamentalist (2007), the essay positions the novel as a counter-historical text that challenges the truisms that breathe life into 9/11 Islamophobia. In so doing, it engages with the countertextual through the ways in which literariness travels from the novel into everyday politics. This essay puts forward a consideration of 'decolonial post-truth' as a rhetorical technique inspired by Walter Mignolo's concept of decoloniality. This article proposes an alternative interpretation of 'post-truth', approaching it as a challenge to dominant systems of knowledge expressed through literary narratives. Post-truth techniques were, for instance, said to have characterised Donald Trump's presidential campaign in the United States as well as the Brexit lobby in the United Kingdom. In contemporary political discourse, the term 'post-truth' denotes rhetorical techniques often directed at garnering popular support.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |